comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Dowie <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: why can't we declare unconstrained objects ?
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:21:45 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-12-12T18:21:45+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cpi27p$2ft$1@titan.btinternet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa59671.0412120743.5cc44da6@posting.google.com>

Michael Mounteney wrote:
> Is there a simple way in Ada of simulating C/C++ unions ?  It seems to
> me that this is gratuitously prevented, that is, it can be done with
> safety, by extending an existing run-time check, but it is in fact
> prevented by the compiler.
> 
> Hopefully the following commented source will illustrate my point.
> 
> with Ada.text_IO;
> 
> procedure unconstrained is
> 
> 	-- Very simple discriminated type
> 	type thing (what : Boolean) is

Simply add a default to the discriminant and you can change it all you 
want at run-time (e.g. "what : Boolean := Boolean'First").

Cheers

-- Martin



  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-12 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-12 15:43 why can't we declare unconstrained objects ? Michael Mounteney
2004-12-12 17:39 ` Martin Krischik
2004-12-12 17:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-12-12 18:21 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
2004-12-12 18:40   ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-12-12 19:24     ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-12-15 13:39 ` David Botton
2004-12-15 21:47   ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox