From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Subject: Re: record extension aggregate for returned type legal?
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:22:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-10-15T17:22:02+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ckp0vq$a2l$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: t7tokc.2he.ln@skymaster
Jean-Pierre Rosen <rosen@adalog.fr> wrote:
: Unless I missed something, this thread was about *legality rules*.
: And yes, I find more efficient to ask the compiler rather than dig into
: the ARM.
In the case of (T with T_Component => value) GNAT's answer
contradicts ObjectAda's answer if T is at the root of a hierarchy of
tagged types.
-- Georg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-15 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-12 1:31 record extension aggregate for returned type legal? Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-12 8:04 ` Martin Krischik
2004-10-12 14:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
[not found] ` <1940150.rU8f1KaX3L@linux1.krischik.com>
2004-10-12 20:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-13 7:52 ` Martin Krischik
[not found] ` <ckjlhm$2hh$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
[not found] ` <ukhbd.106086$dP1.396181@newsc.telia.net>
2004-10-14 0:29 ` Is T an ancestor of T? Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-14 8:54 ` Is T an ancestor of T? (was: Re: record extension aggregate for returned type legal?) Martin Krischik
[not found] ` <ckot3m$hek$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
2004-10-15 16:55 ` Is T an ancestor of T? Martin Krischik
2004-10-15 17:19 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-16 14:37 ` Martin Krischik
2004-10-13 16:18 ` record extension aggregate for returned type legal? Jean-Pierre Rosen
[not found] ` <87ekk0hvfq.fsf@beeblebrox.rfc1149.net>
2004-10-15 16:51 ` Martin Krischik
[not found] ` <t7tokc.2he.ln@skymaster>
2004-10-15 17:22 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2004-10-14 20:04 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox