From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Subject: record extension aggregate for returned type legal?
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:31:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-10-12T01:31:08+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ckfc4r$lsv$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> (raw)
Using two different compilers, I get contradicting messages
for the following package, viz no message at all, and an
error message pointing to LRM 4.3.2(4). Which one is right?
package Ext is
type T is tagged private;
package B is
function make return T;
end B;
private
type T is tagged record
n: Natural;
end record;
end Ext;
package body Ext is
package body B is
function make return T is
begin
return (T with n => 0); -- here
--return (n => 0);
end make;
end B;
end Ext;
-- TIA, georg
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-12 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-12 1:31 Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2004-10-12 8:04 ` record extension aggregate for returned type legal? Martin Krischik
2004-10-12 14:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
[not found] ` <1940150.rU8f1KaX3L@linux1.krischik.com>
2004-10-12 20:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-13 7:52 ` Martin Krischik
[not found] ` <ckjlhm$2hh$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
[not found] ` <ukhbd.106086$dP1.396181@newsc.telia.net>
2004-10-14 0:29 ` Is T an ancestor of T? Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-14 8:54 ` Is T an ancestor of T? (was: Re: record extension aggregate for returned type legal?) Martin Krischik
[not found] ` <ckot3m$hek$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
2004-10-15 16:55 ` Is T an ancestor of T? Martin Krischik
2004-10-15 17:19 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-16 14:37 ` Martin Krischik
2004-10-13 16:18 ` record extension aggregate for returned type legal? Jean-Pierre Rosen
[not found] ` <87ekk0hvfq.fsf@beeblebrox.rfc1149.net>
2004-10-15 16:51 ` Martin Krischik
[not found] ` <t7tokc.2he.ln@skymaster>
2004-10-15 17:22 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-10-14 20:04 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox