From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: Missing features in Ada.Containers
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:04:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-10-08T15:04:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ck6a9e$91c$1@hercules.btinternet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 41668BFA.3050403@mailinator.com
"Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:41668BFA.3050403@mailinator.com...
>> Matt is working on wording to not just have "ordered set" and "hashed
>> map"
>> but also "ordered map" and "hashed set" in the AI. It is very hard to
>> include /every/(!) possible container type into the standard without the
>> size of the standard exploding to the point that most of it is taken up
>> with
>> container libraries!
>
> Great. I was somewhat more surprised because Charles already had them. Of
> course, if all combinations were to be provided there are a lot of them.
> Multiply times two if you want to provide protected versions...
That doesn't mean that the ARG would accept any new packages...
...but, as we say here in Scotland "Shy bairns don't get sweeties!" :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-08 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-08 9:03 Missing features in Ada.Containers Alex R. Mosteo
2004-10-08 9:49 ` Martin Dowie
2004-10-08 12:45 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2004-10-08 15:04 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
2004-10-08 10:07 ` Martin Dowie
2004-10-08 12:43 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2004-10-08 14:57 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox