Re: Missing features in Ada.Containers

["Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>]

Martin Dowie wrote:
> Alex R. Mosteo wrote:
> 
>>Of the top of my head I find notable the absence of the "hashed
>>strings" container. Now it seems you're alone with a "hashed map"
>>whose keys are generic of constrained nature. Thus you must make some
>>leaps to have the old (and in my case, most used) hashed string
>>container. Indeed it requires ugly conversions between the key type,
>>String, defining the hashing function simply to reuse the
>>Ada.Hash_String, etc. It smells so wrong to me that I'm almost sure
>>I'm missing something obvious here.
> 
> 
> Can't you use "Ada.Containers.Indefinite_Hashed_Maps"?

That's it. I knew I was missing something :( When I looked at the 
package I missed that the Key was unconstrained too.