From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: AI-344, generics/instances...
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:03:59 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-09-16T20:03:59+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cicrjf$2il$1@sparta.btinternet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6ZCdnTuj2N7qT9TcRVn-sg@megapath.net
"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote in message
news:6ZCdnTuj2N7qT9TcRVn-
> Probably the best way to do that for user code would be to define a
> Restriction similar to No_Dependence. But that probably would be
> controversial; we ended up limiting No_Dependence to only language-defined
> units because of concerns with supporting user-defined units. (And in any
> case it is too late for the standard; the scope of the Amendment is set,
> and
> the hope is to approve all of the amendments at the next meeting -- which
> starts tomorrow.)
I thought that - but I'll happily wait for Ada1Z! :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-16 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-16 12:58 AI-344, generics/instances Martin Dowie
2004-09-16 17:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-09-16 20:03 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
2004-09-17 8:51 ` Peter Hermann
2004-09-17 11:19 ` Number_Base 36 revisited (was: AI-344, generics/instances...) Marius Amado Alves
2004-09-17 13:26 ` AI-344, generics/instances Martin Dowie
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox