From: Manuel Gomez <mgrojo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: More of less most standard Ada binding to POSIX
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:44:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2010-01-26T11:44:31-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf614a74-5f9e-4fb5-8201-3978d0bc05b2@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: abacdac6-0cfe-4b97-a599-cc827942e4ef@e11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com
On 24 ene, 21:59, Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne) <yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr>
wrote:
> I came to know about Ada POSIX bindings, and its seeming only one
> implementation : Florist.
> What do nice peoples here know about this subject ?
>
> I guess Ada has a lot of concerned with POSIX, but I only this one
> binding, Florist, specific to GNAT. Or may be some other vendors also
> provide their own implementation of the Florist specifications ? (free
> or not free of charge, the may target here should be to know if
> weither or not this is a fully GNAT specific binding).
Have you read the POSIX binding page on the Ada Programming wikibook
[1]? That's all the information I could gather about the Ada-POSIX
standard. The only implementation of the standard, apart from Florist,
that I found was an incomplete one for Win32 systems by Pascal Obry
[2]. But I've found now that Object Ada for Linux also provides one
[3].
[1] http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Platform/POSIX
[2] http://pagesperso-orange.fr/pascal.obry/w32posix.html
[3] http://www.aonix.com/pdf/oa-linux.pdf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-24 20:59 More of less most standard Ada binding to POSIX Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2010-01-26 19:44 ` Manuel Gomez [this message]
2010-01-27 1:40 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2010-01-27 2:20 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox