From: rod.chapman@praxis-cs.co.uk (Rod Chapman)
Subject: Re: Enforcing good software process
Date: 30 Apr 2003 10:01:00 -0700
Date: 2003-04-30T17:01:01+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf2c6063.0304300901.53bb7caa@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uwuhdvxcd.fsf@nasa.gov
Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov> wrote in message news:
> I never said anything about "guarranteed correct". I was talking about
> reliability, and about liability. Ford and GM are liable when their
> cars break; it would be nice if there were more software companies
> that took the same attitude.
We have delivered software with warranties, and we will continue to
do so. Examples are CDIS (part of the London air-traffic management
systems), SHOLIS, and the MULTOS CA. In the case of the latter
project, four defects were reported in the first year of operation - these
were corrected under our warranty at no cost to our client.
- Rod, Praxis Critical Systems
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-30 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-25 15:14 Enforcing good software process Stephen Leake
2003-04-25 20:15 ` John R. Strohm
2003-04-28 15:55 ` Stephen Leake
2003-04-29 20:12 ` Kevin Cline
2003-04-29 20:54 ` Stephen Leake
2003-04-30 17:01 ` Rod Chapman [this message]
2003-05-11 23:02 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox