From: igouy@yahoo.com (Isaac Gouy)
Subject: Re: prog lang
Date: 13 Aug 2003 10:00:26 -0700
Date: 2003-08-13T17:00:27+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce7ef1c8.0308130900.70a1877d@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: UN5_a.5750$u%2.1837@nwrdny02.gnilink.net
Tells me that:
"Ada is commonly criticised as typical of government committee work"
Doesn't tell me if the author thinks this is a reasonable criticism.
Gives me the impression that it is.
"Furthermore, government studies :) indicate that it's more
cost-effective than C++, Pascal, or Fortran"
Doesn't tell me if the author thinks it's more cost-effective. Gives
me the impression that "the studies" shouldn't be trusted because they
were done by the promoters of the technology. (Gosh aren't there
studies not done by "the government" that show the same thing)
What's great about this recycled gossip?
> > http://microsoft.toddverbeek.com/lang.html
> Great page, but there is only one problem: the Ada link takes you to the
> badly out of date adahome!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-13 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-12 0:30 prog lang g_ak
2003-08-12 13:17 ` Frank J. Lhota
2003-08-13 17:00 ` Isaac Gouy [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox