From: Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net>
Subject: Re: is having a complex type as built-in the languages vs. being in standard package makes performance difference?
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-05-16T14:08:40-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd22d6b6-8cae-4713-ab92-9779f0b2eaf9@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4fb3fea6$0$9521$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net
On May 16, 12:23 pm, Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauh...@futureapps.de>
wrote:
> If the two components could be cleverly used by the compiler so that
> GCCs auto-vectorization becomes effective, maybe. To see advantages
> in manipulating (re, im) explicitly and separately now,
> these programs demonstrate by computing the same output
> at very different speed.
>
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=mandelbrot&lan...http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=mandelbrot&lan...http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=mandelbrot&lan...
The third of these has no table of results.
Jerry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-16 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 18:25 is having a complex type as built-in the languages vs. being in standard package makes performance difference? Nasser M. Abbasi
2012-05-16 19:23 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-05-16 21:08 ` Jerry [this message]
2012-05-16 21:33 ` georg bauhaus
2012-05-17 1:48 ` Isaac Gouy
2012-05-16 19:26 ` gautier_niouzes
2012-05-17 0:19 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox