From: Gautier write-only <gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com>
Subject: TIOBE index
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:53:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2010-03-08T03:53:34-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca9cc299-908c-48de-8b92-eda44c2bebbb@f8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> (raw)
Hello,
From time to time I'm looking at the TIOBE Programming Community Index
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
The results, for long, are not very glorious for Ada, but I told
myself if was like it was.
For instance the latest ranking for Pascal, Fortran and Ada are:
Tiobe ranking
--------------
Pascal 0.603%
Fortran 0.563%
Ada 0.376%
Now, I spent a few minutes to look at the figures myself, following
the famous citation "The only statistics you can trust are those you
falsified yourself".
So I made the search engine queries as described there:
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_definition.htm
including 1-year time windowing when available.
Here are the results (the simple queries without time windowing give
similar results):
Google Google Blogs MSN Yahoo! Wikipedia
YouTube
------------------------------------------------------------------
Pascal 2'020'000 25'027 3'170'000 25'200'000 1'664 232
Fortran 1'510'000 11'768 1'640'000 7'900'000 949 113
Ada 2'140'000 110'310 2'670'000 49'300'000 1'764 70
With the weights being 23% for each engine, except YouTube with 7%, it
is obviously impossible to have Ada's ranking that is lower than
Fortran's and even than Pascal's.
Funny thing: the weights sum up to more than 100%, so don't forget to
divide by the sum of weights!
If you take for instance Pascal's ranking as a reference, the rankings
would be actually the following:
Pascal 0.603%
Fortran 0.294%
Ada 0.668% <- uh-oh, almost the "A" category...
Of course the reference (here Pascal) would need as well a re-ranking,
up or down, which would influence Fortran's and Ada's - this would
mean to gather the full index data!
Did I miss something ? Some "soft factors" ?
I have an Excel sheet for those interested.
Or should we bug TIOBE about their statistics' quality ?
Or publish a fair, transparent index based on the TIOBE idea, but with
the publication of the figures ?
______________________________________________________________
Gautier's Ada programming -- http://gautiersblog.blogspot.com/
NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the following web site:
http://www.fechtenafz.ethz.ch/wm_email.htm
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-08 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-08 11:53 Gautier write-only [this message]
2010-03-08 15:41 ` TIOBE index Martin Krischik
2010-03-08 16:26 ` Gautier write-only
2010-03-08 20:18 ` Gautier write-only
2010-03-09 20:48 ` Gautier write-only
2010-03-08 19:39 ` Tero Koskinen
2010-03-08 20:22 ` Gautier write-only
2010-03-08 22:04 ` jonathan
2010-03-12 13:28 ` Marco
2010-03-11 13:03 ` Gautier write-only
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-26 15:21 Martin Krischik
2010-09-26 21:53 ` jonathan
2010-09-28 18:59 ` Martin Krischik
2010-10-26 2:41 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-10-26 2:45 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox