Re: Differences with/without .all

[Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>]

On Mar 17, 3:51 pm, I <a...@irvine.com> wrote:

> [The main reason for 6.4(8) is: Suppose "Func" denotes an access-to-
> function type.

A bit sloppy of me... of course I meant "a value of an access-to-
function type".

                                 -- Adam

> If you say Func(param,param,param), this results in an
> implicit dereference of Func, and a call to the function pointed to by
> Func.  But you cannot get a call to the function pointed to by Func if
> there is no parameter list, even if the function type doesn't have any
> parameters, or all parameters have defaults.  You must to say Func.all
> in that case.]