comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cts@kampong.aedinc.net (Craig Spannring)
Subject: Databases and Ada95
Date: 2000/02/04
Date: 2000-02-04T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cXDm4.953$rH3.1395@newsfeed.slurp.net> (raw)


I'm kind of in the dark about accessing databases from Ada95.
I've seen mention of SAME and SAMEDL, but I can't seem to locate any
documentation about those.  Does anyone actually use/support those?

Unless something else pops It looks like my options are 
  1) Use thin bindings to whatever C library the DB vendor supplies.
  2) Write thick bindings to the vendor supplied C library.
  3) Use thin bindings to ODBC.
  4) Use Pascal Obry's bindings to ODBC.

The 3rd and 4th choices only work for MS-Windows.  Choice 1 means my
code would be specific to one RDBMS not to mention messy.  Choice 2
requires a lot of work, but if the bindings were done properly, the
calling code could be (mostly) database independent in roughly the
same way JDBC applications are DB independent;  Only the package body
for the bindings would have to be rewritten for each RDBMS.

If I can't find a better solution I'm leaning toward #2.  I'd rather
not reinvent wheels I don't have to, namely the package specification.
Are there (documented) database access specifications available?


-- 
=======================================================================
 Life is short.                  | Craig Spannring 
      Bike hard, ski fast.       | cts@internetcds.com
 --------------------------------+------------------------------------




             reply	other threads:[~2000-02-04  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-02-04  0:00 Craig Spannring [this message]
2000-02-04  0:00 ` Databases and Ada95 Sune Falck
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox