From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: FRAC tool?
Date: 1999/06/26
Date: 1999-06-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cS3d3.19$bo2.710@typhoon.nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7l03ds$5a4$1@nnrp1.deja.com
In article <7l03ds$5a4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
>The issue is whether the given statements generate code. In
>this case clearly both statements generate code. The fact that
>the one instruction of the code takes care of both statements
>does not change this fact.
>
>If you think of Ada as defined by a virtual operational machine,
>the issue is whether this virtual operational machine would have
>code generated, assuming an appropriate realistic abstraction
>level for the machine.
>
>Sure this is vague, but could be made quite precise if someone
>desired to do so.
>
>I still see a quite clear intuitive distinction between the
>above two statements, and a statement that says
>
> begin
I don't. In the presence of exception handlers or cleanup code, the
"begin" could easily generate far more code than the two arithmetic
statements in question. Even a declaration with no initialization
might do a dynamic stack allocation in some contexts (e.g., some
declarations with -fstack-check in GNAT).
prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-06-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-17 0:00 FRAC tool? Ken Garlington
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-05-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-21 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-05-31 0:00 ` Stuart Palin
1999-06-09 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-06-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-06-19 0:00 ` Richard Kenner
1999-06-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-06-26 0:00 ` Richard Kenner [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox