From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: array of strings in a function
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:00:08 GMT
Date: 2003-10-16T20:00:08+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cNCjb.573898$cF.246507@rwcrnsc53> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Q_Ajb.3191$s93.1793@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net
>Certainly. But to handle an arbitrary number of parameters, you have to
I think you mean "large" rather than "arbitrary". The latter, of
course, is impossible using any finite technique. So the relevant
question is how big "large" must be, and whether that number of
procedures is a less or more desirable implementation than the various
other techniques proposed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-16 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-14 20:54 array of strings in a function Antonio Martínez
2003-10-15 2:55 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-10-15 3:29 ` Jeff C,
2003-10-15 3:08 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-10-16 6:40 ` tmoran
2003-10-16 9:31 ` Craig Carey
2003-10-16 18:13 ` Craig Carey
2003-10-16 21:44 ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-10-17 19:48 ` Craig Carey
2003-10-18 10:05 ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-10-18 20:05 ` Craig Carey
2003-10-30 9:42 ` Craig Carey
2003-10-16 17:58 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-10-16 20:00 ` tmoran [this message]
2003-10-17 0:51 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-10-15 11:49 ` Antonio Martínez Álvarez
2003-10-15 12:29 ` Preben Randhol
2003-10-15 14:19 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2003-10-16 14:30 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-10-16 17:53 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-10-17 0:48 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-10-17 18:41 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox