Re: Task discriminants

["Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>]

"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote in message
news:qs2dndOX7I9aEDPdRVn-gw@megapath.net...
> "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > Given this last statement, is it worth changing the RM to make this a
> > Confirmation or Implementation Advice or some such?
>
> Well, we'd need a compelling reason to make a change here, because it's
> possible that some implementors do use this rule to some advantage. The
only
> time it matters is when you have side effects during elaboration, which is
> generally discouraged anyway.

The only thing I can think of that some users are currently taking advantage
of what is partically implemented! :-)

Is there any compiler out that that does not do the 'right thing' - I've
certainly
never come across one.

-- Martin