From: xorque <xorquewasp@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Hide annotations on procedures.
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-06-12T13:47:34-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8cdff9d-de7e-4e25-a31a-5d616fbcd7f0@d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 46a4a9cf-a5b7-4fd7-8c79-c271cb0a93ea@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com
Phil Thornley wrote:
> The derives annotation is certainly needed and goes immediately after
> the procedure declaration - before the 'is'. (The hide goes after the
> 'is'.)
Argh!
I was putting it after the 'is'.
Nice catch...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-12 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 13:35 Hide annotations on procedures xorque
2009-06-12 13:51 ` Phil Thornley
2009-06-12 20:47 ` xorque [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox