From: Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How is Ada's GNOGA better than C++'s Wt?
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 20:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-05-18T20:01:59-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8713676-0a95-45ba-be5f-354c66f57ef5@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81d14d85-1c41-4558-93e5-6a6d9ecf091a@googlegroups.com>
On Friday, May 18, 2018 at 3:01:49 PM UTC-4, Dan'l Miller wrote:
> This brings up a related topic: What are all the ways that Ada's GNOGA at http://Gnoga.com is better than, say, C++'s Wt (pronounced Witty*) at http://WebToolkit.eu/wt? I'll start:
I don't know others feelings on the topic, but one of the things I really
like about Gnoga is that it is a concurrent GUI framework. Every event
has its own thread, so you are free to block as needed when needed.
I don't know Wt well enough to say 100% it isn't similar, but everything
that I have read on it puts the GUI operations in a single thread. I know
it isn't a huge thing, but sometimes the little things make a difference.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-19 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-18 19:01 How is Ada's GNOGA better than C++'s Wt? Dan'l Miller
2018-05-18 19:36 ` Simon Wright
2018-05-19 3:01 ` Jere [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox