From: andrewshvets@odysseyconsult.com
Subject: Re: Idiomatic formatting for empty package
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2017-10-05T16:49:12-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c73a8bc7-e405-4157-bf52-b229f356607e@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <or3k95$532$1@gioia.aioe.org>
On Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at 5:36:42 PM UTC-4, Victor Porton wrote:
> What is more idiomatic?
>
> package X is
> end X;
>
> or
>
> package X is
>
> end X;
>
> --
> Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
It would depend on personal taste. I honestly don't see a difference between the two.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-05 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 21:36 Idiomatic formatting for empty package Victor Porton
2017-10-04 22:10 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-05 5:27 ` Re : " Pascal Obry
2017-10-05 18:10 ` marciant
2017-10-05 23:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-06 20:04 ` marciant
2017-10-07 1:55 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-05 23:36 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-06 8:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-10-07 1:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-07 6:55 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-10-09 21:45 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-10 7:12 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-10-10 10:21 ` AdaMagica
2017-10-10 14:34 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-10-10 17:38 ` AdaMagica
2017-10-05 23:49 ` andrewshvets [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox