From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Weird problem with recursion and tasks
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:07:26 +0100
Date: 2006-12-05T14:07:26+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6krhi1wr6nr$.9e7chapvmtwt.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1165318729.11036.9.camel@localhost
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:38:49 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 12:09 -0800, christopher.orihuela@gmail.com wrote:
>> well, if anybody ever has the same problem, someone else found a
>> workaround: using pointers to objects task declared at an equal or
>> higher level than the procedure that launches them.
>
> Does this mean we shouldn't use Ada the way it was designed
> when using GNAT?
Was it a rhetorical question? I like to answer those! (:-)) Yes, we
shouldn't, because there is pretty little choice for people outside large
firms. Because even in a large firm you have first to convince management
to buy licenses. GNAT de facto is a monopolist on the market which isn't a
market at all...
So either you fix your program or you do the compiler. [Rhetorically] What
would you choose?
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-05 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-03 3:21 Weird problem with recursion and tasks christopher.orihuela
2006-12-03 8:34 ` Gautier
2006-12-03 9:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-12-03 13:56 ` Matthew Heaney
2006-12-05 0:50 ` Craig Carey <research@ijs.co.nz>
2006-12-03 21:10 ` christopher.orihuela
2006-12-04 20:09 ` christopher.orihuela
2006-12-05 11:38 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-12-05 13:07 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2006-12-05 12:03 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-12-05 12:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-12-05 13:00 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-12-05 20:37 ` christopher.orihuela
2006-12-05 22:16 ` christopher.orihuela
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox