From: Rod Kay <rodakay@internode.on.net>
Subject: Re: Reason for 'Ada.Strings.Bounded' not being declared 'pragma Pure' ?
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 20:36:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2013-12-05T20:36:32-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6c71018-0e6e-46a7-a8f5-fdac132ab68d@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l7qn02$v8t$1@loke.gir.dk>
On Friday, 6 December 2013 07:17:05 UTC+11, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> We re-analyzed all of the existing packages for Ada 2005, and changed the
> categorization of some of them. The details can be found in AI95-0362-1
>
Thank you for the detailed explanation, Randy. I see the matter has been given a good deal of thought. I'd be happy to submit a request for further consideration in the next standard, if it seems a reasonable request.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-06 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-05 3:58 Reason for 'Ada.Strings.Bounded' not being declared 'pragma Pure' ? Rod Kay
2013-12-05 6:50 ` Shark8
2013-12-05 8:16 ` Rod Kay
2013-12-05 9:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-12-05 20:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-12-06 3:03 ` Brad Moore
2013-12-06 4:43 ` Rod Kay
2013-12-06 4:36 ` Rod Kay [this message]
2013-12-06 4:28 ` Rod Kay
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox