From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reason for 'Ada.Strings.Bounded' not being declared 'pragma Pure' ?
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2013-12-04T22:50:57-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <927ec816-b6a7-47e8-a217-894b854f44e9@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45ccc264-b606-45d1-a766-f1d8e652212f@googlegroups.com>
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 8:58:46 PM UTC-7, Rod Kay wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Would anyone know the reason for this ?
>
>
>
> Bounded strings would appear to be useful for DSA at least. As a test, I copied/renamed the relevant bounded string packages and made them Pure and found no obvious problems (a simple test compiled and ran ok).
Does DSA = Distributed System Application?
Another package that would be nice in a different categorization is Ada.Tags (it would be nice to be able to use them across DSA partitions and in remote-call interfaces).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-05 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-05 3:58 Reason for 'Ada.Strings.Bounded' not being declared 'pragma Pure' ? Rod Kay
2013-12-05 6:50 ` Shark8 [this message]
2013-12-05 8:16 ` Rod Kay
2013-12-05 9:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-12-05 20:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-12-06 3:03 ` Brad Moore
2013-12-06 4:43 ` Rod Kay
2013-12-06 4:36 ` Rod Kay
2013-12-06 4:28 ` Rod Kay
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox