From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Non_Primitive Operations and Object.Operation Resolution
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 23:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2016-04-21T23:27:38-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5de61ce-ed58-4818-86e5-6d519db355a8@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nfbfj0$1m2$1@dont-email.me>
Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016 23:13:19 UTC+2 schrieb Jeffrey R. Carter:
> That would probably be a good idea. Subtypes are not types and I'd think should
> not be considered an ancestor of the type. Considering a subtype as an ancestor
> seems like it would be a disaster.
Only, subtypes have names, the type of a subtype is anonymous. What you see in a type declaration is the first subtype.
Don't know whether this is related to your problen - just to corret the nomenclature.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-22 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 23:59 Non_Primitive Operations and Object.Operation Resolution Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-04-21 20:28 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-04-21 21:13 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-04-22 6:27 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2016-04-22 18:24 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-04-22 22:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-04-23 0:37 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-04-22 23:49 ` ytomino
2016-04-23 0:38 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox