From: prenom_nomus@yahoo.com (Mark)
Subject: Re: Documentation Standards
Date: 20 Aug 2001 07:07:00 -0700
Date: 2001-08-20T14:07:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5b88987.0108200607.75ccabb6@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B7E64B2.AE1D4938@earthlink.net
>
> What appears to me be the next generation of the 2167A/498 evolution is
> J-STD-016. If you're familiar with 2167, you'll get a warm fuzzy
> looking through this. J-STD-016 is titled something like "Software Life
> Cycle Processes", and is a joint IEEE/EIA standard. I got my copy via
> my employer, which cost them somewhere in the vicinity of $200--I think,
> for sure at least $100.
It doesn't sound very new see:
http://www.software.org/quagmire/descriptions/j-std-016.asp
http://www.abelia.com/pubsmain.htm
http://www.software.org/dcspin/Past_Mtgs1999.html#Aug99
Aren't most organizations just taking the 498/016 standard and
tailoring it to meet their needs since the DoD no longer enforces this
kind of standard?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-20 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-16 4:10 Documentation Standards John R. Strohm
2001-08-16 13:52 ` Mark Johnson
2001-08-16 15:28 ` Jerry Petrey
2001-08-16 19:53 ` Simon Wright
2001-08-17 14:34 ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-16 13:53 ` Marin David Condic
2001-08-17 14:08 ` DuckE
2001-08-18 13:42 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-08-20 14:07 ` Mark [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox