Re: If a routine should return two results, how should it be done?

[Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>]

On 14-07-26 21:00 , Victor Porton wrote:
> If a routine should return two results, how should it be done?

Pick any method you like (but not case 2, if you want to be compatible
with pre-2012 Ada).

> 1. procedure with two out arguments;
> 
> 2. function with one out argument;
> 
> 3. create specific record type for the result type of the function?
> 
> What are advantages and disadvantages of each variant?

The same as in any other language which offers these choices, which is
most languages (well, for C you must use pointers for "out" and "in
out", but logically it is the same thing).

Oh, compared to C++ there is a small difference, in that Ada allows
overloading on the result type; in C++ one would perhaps avoid choices 3
(and 2) for that reason.

Personally I would first consider if the "two results" are logically
connected in such a way that they actually represent one composite
result, and then I would have a subprogram with one result -- no
problem. Otherwise, I would use choice 1. Choice 2 would be acceptable
to me only in very special cases, such as a random-number generator.

-- 
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
      .      @       .