From: Peter Hermann <ica2ph@sinus.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: Xlib Binding or Re-implementation?
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:09:10 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2004-03-18T10:09:10+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3bsg5$4tc$1@news.BelWue.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrnc5ispt.48s.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no
Preben Randhol <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org> wrote:
> Now this said. I would rather have Gwindow or Claw ported to work on
> Linux and Mac OS, than a new library. I don't want to put you off what
if Randy agrees...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-18 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-16 21:20 Xlib Binding or Re-implementation? Ben Atkin
2004-03-17 9:46 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-17 23:11 ` Ben Atkin
2004-03-18 0:19 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-03-20 22:48 ` Ben Atkin
2004-03-21 8:34 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-18 10:00 ` Preben Randhol
2004-03-18 10:09 ` Peter Hermann [this message]
2004-03-18 20:36 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-03-31 7:36 ` David Starner
2004-03-17 10:34 ` Ludovic Brenta
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox