From: Marc C <mc.provisional@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Type vs subtype about visibility of parent's private full definition
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 06:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-05-16T06:54:25-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3456943-e887-465d-879c-652f0a51620a@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.ww47xywzule2fv@cardamome>
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:45:24 PM UTC-5, Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne) wrote:
> So I will go with subtype anyway (have no choice), and will mark this with
> a comment like “-- GNAT bug” to remind me (and may be others, who know)
> it's not an Ada issue.
And also send a writeup on this to report@adacore.com so they're aware of it. Include your test program, the LRM references, and maybe a link to this discussion thread.
Since you're not a supported user it's unlikely they'll jump to fix it, but it likely will be fixed at some point.
Marc A. Criley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-15 8:13 Type vs subtype about visibility of parent's private full definition Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2013-05-15 14:44 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-05-15 20:45 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2013-05-16 13:54 ` Marc C [this message]
2013-05-17 0:01 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-05-17 15:48 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-05-16 15:29 ` Simon Wright
2013-05-16 20:25 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2013-05-16 20:28 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox