From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org>
Subject: Re: protected type interrupts
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:57:44 GMT
Date: 2006-08-25T20:57:44+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bvJHg.152959$1i1.59895@attbi_s72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mf6mce.8k2.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
>>
> But since you specified a priority for the PO (and assuming
> priority_ceiling), you still execute at interrupt priority. Depending on
> the hardware and how priorities are managed, this may delay or hide
> actual interrupts.
Right. I said that in another message, IIRC. The message you were
replying to was mostly nit picking, correcting the OP's assumption that
the entry was being executed BY the interrupt handler.
--
Jeff Carter
"This school was here before you came,
and it'll be here before you go."
Horse Feathers
48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-25 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 14:47 protected type interrupts REH
2006-08-24 15:39 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 16:23 ` REH
2006-08-24 18:15 ` Adam Beneschan
2006-08-24 19:16 ` REH
2006-08-24 21:16 ` Adam Beneschan
2006-08-24 21:39 ` REH
2006-08-25 6:45 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 23:55 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 6:42 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 23:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 6:38 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 20:11 ` Simon Wright
2006-08-24 23:50 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 6:48 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-25 11:33 ` REH
2006-08-25 17:27 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-25 20:57 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2006-08-25 23:17 ` REH
2006-08-26 6:38 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-26 13:16 ` REH
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox