From: "Riccardo" <kk@kk.com>
Subject: ADA vs JAVA sockets
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:39:28 +0100
Date: 2004-01-07T09:39:28+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <btggi3$evu$1@e3k.asi.ansaldo.it> (raw)
Hi!
I'm trying to put together two applications written respectively in ADA and
in JAVA.
Each one has its own socket mechanism (in ADA I use G N A T . S O C K E T S
ver. 1.27 and in JAVA the standard sockets: JAVA.net).
Using UDP protocol on a direct connection (no other machines in between)
when I have big quantities of data it appends that some data get lost.
Introducing some delays (in both directions: either receiving in ADA or
JAVA) the problem seems to be solved.
Is there someone that found the same difficulty?
Can I say thet JAVA brings such kind of problems?
(the same program in ADA works fine with an application written in C++)
Thanks!
Riccardo
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 8:39 Riccardo [this message]
2004-01-07 13:31 ` ADA vs JAVA sockets Duncan Sands
2004-01-07 16:28 ` Jano
2004-01-07 19:44 ` Pascal Obry
2004-01-07 21:11 ` Duncan Sands
2004-01-08 14:31 ` Gnat 3.15p bugs (was: ADA vs JAVA sockets) Jano
2004-01-08 16:24 ` Duncan Sands
2004-01-08 19:14 ` Jano
2004-01-08 20:16 ` tmoran
2004-01-08 20:58 ` Duncan Sands
2004-01-07 14:24 ` ADA vs JAVA sockets Stephen Leake
2004-01-07 15:43 ` Steve
2004-01-07 22:23 ` Frode Tennebø
2004-01-08 7:09 ` David Marceau
2004-01-08 8:32 ` More details on:--- ADA vs JAVA sockets--- Riccardo
2004-01-08 20:16 ` tmoran
2004-01-09 7:27 ` Riccardo
2004-01-09 8:45 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2004-01-09 10:27 ` thanks Riccardo
2004-01-09 13:58 ` thanks Robert Spooner
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox