From: brashepw@sd2.wpafb.af.mil (PHILIP W. BRASHEAR)
Subject: Re: Ada 95 Compatibility
Date: 1996/02/23
Date: 1996-02-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <brashepw.825085880@sd2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4gipjq$l3q@wdl1.wdl.loral.com
mab@dst17.wdl.loral.com (Mark A Biggar) writes:
>In article <4gi8o8$an2@newsbf02.news.aol.com> johnherro@aol.com (John Herro) writes:
>> In Ada 95, a package spec. that doesn't *need* an corresponding body
>>can't *have* one. Here's a simplified program segment that I wrote in Ada
>>83:
>--
>Mark Biggar
>mab@wdl.loral.com
By the way, remember that this restriction is on LIBRARY packages -- not
nested packages.
Phil Brashear
CTA INCORPORATED
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-02-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-02-22 0:00 Ada 95 Compatibility John Herro
1996-02-22 0:00 ` Mark A Biggar
1996-02-23 0:00 ` PHILIP W. BRASHEAR [this message]
1996-02-23 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1996-02-23 0:00 ` Peter Amey
1996-02-23 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-02-24 0:00 ` John Herro
1996-02-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-02-26 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-02-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-02-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox