From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Subject: Re: High compilation time with gnat
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 18:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2003-12-03T18:33:01+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bqla8t$6tg$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 789qsv8gfn5j75t00u7cumnq28a2m3moa9@4ax.com
Craig Carey <research@ijs.co.nz> wrote:
: I had a look and I failed to find the message of Mr Brunot and Dewar
: when using the groups.google.com search engine.
The memory is fading, I haven't been too successful myself, sorry.
However, I have noted (or at least I think I have) that nested
packges have resulted in compilation times in excess of what the
the same packages as child packages require (the packages contain
a few instantiations of Charles containers).
Another source of long compilation time is displayed in
procedure PT is
X : constant := 1.0 + 2.0 ** (-1000000);
Y : constant := 1.0 + 2.0 ** (-1000001);
Z : constant := 2.0 ** (1000001) * (X - Y);
begin
Put_Line (Float'Image (Z));
end PT;
which was posted with smaller powers by Laurent Guerby on
2000-09-10.
-- Georg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-03 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-26 8:40 High compilation time with gnat Joachim Schr�er
2003-11-26 12:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
2003-11-26 15:20 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-11-28 8:11 ` Volkert
2003-12-02 23:54 ` Craig Carey
2003-12-03 18:33 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2003-12-03 21:50 ` Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox