Re: New limited range type?

["Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>]

"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1068224385.790621@master.nyc.kbcfp.com...
> Martin Dowie wrote:
> > Standard operator precedent rules should apply - I can't see
> > that as being outragous?
>
> But Ada doesn't define operator evaluation order, so this would
> be a major change in the language. (Not a bad one, just big.)

Well it 'kind of' does in that the order must be "an allowed result
for the left-to-right association".

You could argue that the case "A := B + C - D," for these 'limited
range' types _can_only_ be equivilent to "A := (B + C) - D;".