comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: Is CORBA dead for Ada
@ 2003-10-23  8:50 Lionel.DRAGHI
  2003-10-23 10:46 ` Is CORBA dead for Ada? No, it doesn't appear to be Dirk Craeynest
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lionel.DRAGHI @ 2003-10-23  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: comp.lang.ada



| -----Message d'origine-----
| De: volkert@nivoba.de [mailto:volkert@nivoba.de]
...
| believe me, if there is no visible progress with 
| the corba standard the things will getting harder 
| for some of us ... it is really counterproductive 
| 
I agree with you. 

Others post here answered about actually existing Ada ORB, and that's OK.
But original laurent's demand was about standart. If Ada ORB do not stick to
the latest CORBA version, it will cause interoperability problems, and will
be also interpreted as a further Ada influence loss.

As Volkert said, for a company involved in big systems, this may lead to Ada
drop (and exceptionnaly with an andisputable reason).

Maybe need we just that ORB vendors set our minds at rest by reaffirming
their commitment in Ada for CORBA, as do by Jean-Claude in this thread.

-- 
Lionel Draghi 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada?  No, it doesn't appear to be.
  2003-10-23  8:50 Is CORBA dead for Ada Lionel.DRAGHI
@ 2003-10-23 10:46 ` Dirk Craeynest
  2003-10-23 16:45 ` Is CORBA dead for Ada Laurent Pautet
  2003-10-23 16:47 ` Laurent Pautet
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dirk Craeynest @ 2003-10-23 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4631 bytes --]

In article <mailman.186.1066900280.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>,
 <Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com> wrote:
[...]
>But original laurent's demand was about standart. If Ada ORB do not stick to
>the latest CORBA version, it will cause interoperability problems, and will
>be also interpreted as a further Ada influence loss.
>
>As Volkert said, for a company involved in big systems, this may lead to Ada
>drop (and exceptionnaly with an andisputable reason).
>
>Maybe need we just that ORB vendors set our minds at rest by reaffirming
>their commitment in Ada for CORBA, as do by Jean-Claude in this thread.
>
>--
>Lionel Draghi

It may be useful to point our here that similar threads are ongoing in
the comp.object.corba newsgroup.  Victor Giddings of Objective Interface
System posted there some responses to the issues mentioned above.

FYI, I've included the most relevant below.

-------

From: Victor Giddings <victor.giddings@ois.com>
Newsgroups: comp.object.corba
Subject: Re: CORBA mapping for Ada
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:46:55 -0000
Organization: Objective Interface System

gduzan@bbn.com (Gary D. Duzan) wrote in news:kfdlb.129$lK3.67
@news.level3.com:

> In article <bn2tg2$1mot$1@avanie.enst.fr>,
> Laurent Pautet  <pautet@enst.fr> wrote:
>>It seems to me that the last Ada mapping is for CORBA 2.3. But nothing
>>seems to be done to update it for CORBA 2.X (X > 3) or CORBA 3.0.

I always cringe a little when I see statements like this, even if it the
fault of the OMG in part. The fact is that IDL does not change very
often, so the mapping for CORBA 2.3 is equally useful for 3.0, etc. The
work of updating is more often adding a new operation to CORBA.Object or
something like that, or clarifying the specification of existing features
of the mapping. In fact, anything more major would be outside of the
scope of what an RTF (REVISION Task Force) is allowed to do. Case in
point was value types, which required a new RFP.

>>Could someone tell me what is going on ? Is the ada-rtf still
>>active ?
>
>    The OMG site shows a document number for a revised Ada mapping
> with this month's date on it, but no actual document yet. I would
> expect to see something soon, and the PTC will likely address it
> at the November meeting in London.
>
>                          Gary Duzan
>                          BBN Technologies
>                          A Verizon Company

This is correct. We are working to have an update to meet the 3-week
deadline for the London meeting (due Monday!). Status can be tracked at
http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/Ada_2003_RTF.html

--
Victor Giddings		mailto:victor.giddings@ois.com
Senior Product Engineer	+1 703 295 6500
Objective Interface Systems	Fax: +1 703 295 6501

-------

From: Victor Giddings <victor.giddings@ois.com>
Newsgroups: comp.object.corba
Subject: Re: ADA CORBA intro ?
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:06:04 -0000
Organization: Objective Interface System

Tom Welsh <news@tom-welsh.co.uk> wrote in news:atIlyLAQpb4
+EwRq@nildram.co.uk:

> In article <bbmvme$if22@dsit03.atlas.de>, Stefan N�we <naewe.s_AT_stn-
> atlas.de@?.?> writes
>>Hi there!
>>
>>Does anyone know a CORBA tutorial/introduction for the
>>rare species of ADA programmers ?
>>
> A Google search for simply "CORBA Ada" turns up a surprising amount of
> material.
>
> A good start might be www.ois.com.

You can also refer to my Ada Letters article of five or six years ago,
before I left MITRE. (I can't recall the specific issue, but could look it
up for you). I've also done a more recent article for the COTS Journal (V
3, No. 5, May 2001), but it is more an advocacy article than a tutorial.

> Whether you can get really substantial material free of charge is
> another matter, as CORBA and Ada is a relatively exotic combination
> likely to be of interest mainly to engineers and military/aerospace
> developers.

You might be surprised at the range of application our Ada product has been
used in. This includes an ocean-going yacht
http://www.webriviera.fr/Technology/Kingcat/index.php, high-energy physics
applications http://www.llnl.gov/nif/, ...

--
Victor Giddings		mailto:victor.giddings@ois.com
Senior Product Engineer	+1 703 295 6500
Objective Interface Systems	Fax: +1 703 295 6501

-------

That said, it wouldn't hurt to *see* a bit more Ada related news from
CORBA vendors, both in this newsgroup and elsewhere.

I hope this helps.

Dirk (Dirk.Craeynest@cs.kuleuven.ac.be for Ada-Belgium/Europe e-mail)

*** Intl. Conference on Reliable Software Technologies - Ada-Europe'2004
*** June 14-18, 2004, Palma de Mallorca, Spain ** www.ada-europe.org ***



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: Is CORBA dead for Ada?  No, it doesn't appear to be.
@ 2003-10-23 14:06 Lionel.DRAGHI
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lionel.DRAGHI @ 2003-10-23 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: comp.lang.ada



| -----Message d'origine-----
| De: dirk@heli.cs.kuleuven.ac.be [mailto:dirk@heli.cs.kuleuven.ac.be]
...
| It may be useful to point our here that similar threads are ongoing in
| the comp.object.corba newsgroup.  Victor Giddings of 
| Objective Interface
| System posted there some responses to the issues mentioned above.
| 
Thank you.
As i understand it, the job is ongoing. This is reassuring.

-- 
lionel Draghi




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada
  2003-10-23  8:50 Is CORBA dead for Ada Lionel.DRAGHI
  2003-10-23 10:46 ` Is CORBA dead for Ada? No, it doesn't appear to be Dirk Craeynest
@ 2003-10-23 16:45 ` Laurent Pautet
  2003-10-23 16:47 ` Laurent Pautet
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pautet @ 2003-10-23 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)



Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote:
>But original laurent's demand was about standart. If Ada ORB do not stick to
>the latest CORBA version, it will cause interoperability problems, and will
>be also interpreted as a further Ada influence loss.

Thanks Lionel.

Indeed my question is the current status of the mapping.

I must apologize for having started this troll but at least one CORBA
tool vendor is now on-line :) We had the advertising part about their
technology, we are now waiting for an answer about the mapping :))

-- 
-- Laurent



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada
  2003-10-23  8:50 Is CORBA dead for Ada Lionel.DRAGHI
  2003-10-23 10:46 ` Is CORBA dead for Ada? No, it doesn't appear to be Dirk Craeynest
  2003-10-23 16:45 ` Is CORBA dead for Ada Laurent Pautet
@ 2003-10-23 16:47 ` Laurent Pautet
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pautet @ 2003-10-23 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)



Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote:
>But original laurent's demand was about standart. If Ada ORB do not stick to
>the latest CORBA version, it will cause interoperability problems, and will
>be also interpreted as a further Ada influence loss.

Thanks Lionel.

Indeed my question is the current status of the mapping.

I must apologize for having started this troll but at least one CORBA
tool vendor is now on-line :) We had the advertising part about their
technology, we are now waiting for an answer about the mapping :))

-- 
-- Laurent



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-23 16:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-23  8:50 Is CORBA dead for Ada Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-10-23 10:46 ` Is CORBA dead for Ada? No, it doesn't appear to be Dirk Craeynest
2003-10-23 16:45 ` Is CORBA dead for Ada Laurent Pautet
2003-10-23 16:47 ` Laurent Pautet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-23 14:06 Is CORBA dead for Ada? No, it doesn't appear to be Lionel.DRAGHI

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox