wxWindows binding

wxWindows binding

[Lars]

Hi,

Is there an Ada wxWindows binding?

Thanks,

-Lars

Re: wxWindows binding

[Stephane Richard]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 359 bytes --]

I dont believe there is right now.  However there is a qt Binding, there's
Tcl/Tk, and gtkAda which might prove useful

-- 
St�phane Richard
"Ada World" Webmaster
http://www.adaworld.com


"Lars" <lars-remove_me-m@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:bn49fl$i7p$01$1@news.t-online.com...
> Hi,
>
> Is there an Ada wxWindows binding?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Lars
>
>

Re: wxWindows binding

[Preben Randhol]

On 2003-10-21, Stephane Richard <stephane.richard@verizon.net> wrote:
> I dont believe there is right now.  However there is a qt Binding, there's
> Tcl/Tk, and gtkAda which might prove useful

A qt binding? Where?


-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."

Re: wxWindows binding

[Stephane Richard]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 983 bytes --]

It's seems I've missread my search results.  There have been talks of a Qt
binding to Ada, one was start but never finished and not enough done to be
usable.  So as of today there is no Qt Binding.

I searched for Ada bindings and that came up so I just assumed there was
one, I didn't visit it as I had no need for Qt at the time but it was a
message about the Qt binding that was started.

Sorry for this unintentional error

-- 
St�phane Richard
"Ada World" Webmaster
http://www.adaworld.com


"Preben Randhol" <randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@pvv.org> wrote in
message
news:slrnbpcdro.1pa.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no...
> On 2003-10-21, Stephane Richard <stephane.richard@verizon.net> wrote:
> > I dont believe there is right now.  However there is a qt Binding,
there's
> > Tcl/Tk, and gtkAda which might prove useful
>
> A qt binding? Where?
>
>
> -- 
> "Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
>  language."

Re: wxWindows binding

[Craig Carey]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:47:23 +0200, "Lars" wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Is there an Ada wxWindows binding?
>

My GNAT Ada 95 bindings to wxWindows are now here (uploaded today):

  http://www.ijs.co.nz/code/ada95_wxwindows_cpp_bindings_unfinished.zip


The code of the zip file, lacks a demo example. It would be quite
difficult to produce a completed lot of Ada bindings files.

Possibly the needed pragma Cpp C++ bugfixes of GNAT appeared at
gcc.gnu.org in the merge and update of 20-21 October 2003.

- - - 

(As I almost said in the last message) the "pragma Interrupt_State"
pragma of GNAT is now a feature of the GNU Ada compiler.
So now the whole program would drop out after a Ctrl-C or 'kill -TERM'
is done, instead of the fragment targetted.

Ada bug fixed: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9480




Craig Carey

Re: wxWindows binding

[Stephane Richard]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1094 bytes --]

I stand corrected, to say the least.. :-).

-- 
St�phane Richard
"Ada World" Webmaster
http://www.adaworld.com


"Craig Carey" <research@ijs.co.nz> wrote in message
news:4plcpv8ojkg1h63qa5qgtrl978575lk7a5@4ax.com...
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:47:23 +0200, "Lars" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is there an Ada wxWindows binding?
> >
>
> My GNAT Ada 95 bindings to wxWindows are now here (uploaded today):
>
>   http://www.ijs.co.nz/code/ada95_wxwindows_cpp_bindings_unfinished.zip
>
>
> The code of the zip file, lacks a demo example. It would be quite
> difficult to produce a completed lot of Ada bindings files.
>
> Possibly the needed pragma Cpp C++ bugfixes of GNAT appeared at
> gcc.gnu.org in the merge and update of 20-21 October 2003.
>
> - - -
>
> (As I almost said in the last message) the "pragma Interrupt_State"
> pragma of GNAT is now a feature of the GNU Ada compiler.
> So now the whole program would drop out after a Ctrl-C or 'kill -TERM'
> is done, instead of the fragment targetted.
>
> Ada bug fixed: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9480
>
>
>
>
> Craig Carey
>

Re: wxWindows binding

[Lars]

Cool! Haven't tried it yet, will ASAP.

"Craig Carey" <research@ijs.co.nz> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:4plcpv8ojkg1h63qa5qgtrl978575lk7a5@4ax.com...
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:47:23 +0200, "Lars" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is there an Ada wxWindows binding?
> >
>
> My GNAT Ada 95 bindings to wxWindows are now here (uploaded today):
>
>   http://www.ijs.co.nz/code/ada95_wxwindows_cpp_bindings_unfinished.zip
>
>
> The code of the zip file, lacks a demo example. It would be quite
> difficult to produce a completed lot of Ada bindings files.
>
> Possibly the needed pragma Cpp C++ bugfixes of GNAT appeared at
> gcc.gnu.org in the merge and update of 20-21 October 2003.
>
> - - -
>
> (As I almost said in the last message) the "pragma Interrupt_State"
> pragma of GNAT is now a feature of the GNU Ada compiler.
> So now the whole program would drop out after a Ctrl-C or 'kill -TERM'
> is done, instead of the fragment targetted.
>
> Ada bug fixed: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9480
>
>
>
>
> Craig Carey
>

Re: wxWindows binding

[Craig Carey]

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:31:47 GMT, "Stephane Richard" wrote:

>I stand corrected, to say the least.. :-).


Not corrected: the Ada 95 bindings to wxWindows that I wrote is too
incomplete to permit a demo GUI program to be created.

I tried GNAT's direct bindings feature partly since comp.lang.ada
had no interesting information on the bindings. I assumed that they
were good but instead it was that bugs are rapidly fixed.

There was a big update of the GCC Ada in 20-21 Oct, so it could be
that ACT is going to keep uploading debugged compiler code.
I guessed that GNAT didn't handle multiple inheritance, but also I
didn't spot any use of multiple inheritance in wxWindows.


Craig Carey

Re: wxWindows binding

[Craig Carey]

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 05:34:53 +1300, Craig Carey wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:31:47 GMT, "Stephane Richard" wrote:
>
>>I stand corrected, to say the least.. :-).
>
>[...] the Ada 95 bindings to wxWindows that I wrote [are] too
>incomplete to permit a demo GUI program to be created.


Ada might not get wxWindows bindings for years. Nothing much has changed
except that these next GNAT C++ pragmas are getting a better chance
against the alternative of using C:

   pragma Cpp_Class,
   pragma Cpp_Constructor