From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Subject: Re: SourceForge vs Savannah
Date: 13 Oct 2003 01:35:21 GMT
Date: 2003-10-13T01:35:21+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bmcvgp$kgqu8$1@ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: un0c9gnny.fsf_-_@nasa.gov
After a long battle with technology,Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov>, an earthling, wrote:
> I'm considering moving my library to either SourceForge or Savannah. I
> was leaning towards Savannah, but then someone pointed out that being
> on SourceForge makes it easier for others to find, which is an
> important point.
That seems odd.
Google can as easily find projects in one place as in the other.
I would think it a good idea to be skeptical of the permanence of
either; nothing should prevent maintaining a CVS archive in _both_
places...
--
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "cbbrowne.com")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/oses.html
Yes, for sparkling white chip prints, use low SUDSing DRAW....
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-13 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-10 14:41 SourceForge vs Savannah Stephen Leake
2003-10-10 16:04 ` chris
2003-10-10 17:14 ` Stephen Leake
2003-10-11 7:34 ` Martin Krischik
2003-10-13 8:52 ` Preben Randhol
2003-10-13 16:35 ` Martin Krischik
2003-10-14 14:44 ` Preben Randhol
2003-10-10 19:53 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-10-12 10:25 ` Martin Krischik
2003-10-12 20:43 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-10-13 16:34 ` Martin Krischik
2003-10-11 7:28 ` Martin Krischik
2003-10-13 1:35 ` Christopher Browne [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox