From: Stephan Heinemann <zombie@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Protected Entry Call Semantics
Date: 1 Oct 2003 20:18:22 GMT
Date: 2003-10-01T20:18:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <blfcqe$ahe$1@news.cs.tu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: jmtp41-3k4.ln1@beastie.ix.netcom.com
> If I understand the situation correctly AND if I recall my books
> (temporarily unavailable) correctly, it is (was?) implementation
> independent.
>[...]
You gave the definition for a monitor. If a protected object is
implemented this way everything is fine... I was not sure about the
optimisations that certain implemenations could perform... Phil
(another follow up) provided the reference I did not find: The
entry-queues are serviced immediately when the barrier opens.
Thanks,
Stephan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-01 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-30 21:19 Protected Entry Call Semantics Stephan Heinemann
2003-10-01 7:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-10-01 19:22 ` JP Thornley
2003-10-01 20:07 ` Stephan Heinemann
2003-10-01 20:14 ` Martin Dowie
[not found] ` <jmtp41-3k4.ln1@beastie.ix.netcom.com>
2003-10-01 20:18 ` Stephan Heinemann [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox