From: Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler <ada.rocks@jlfencey.com>
Subject: Re: Omission in the Ada Standard
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:05:11 +0200
Date: 2003-09-26T15:05:11+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bl1djl$7397v$2@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: kYMcb.582614$o%2.263727@sccrnsc02
Jeff C, wrote:
>Second...Code that accesses the ports directly is now obsolete (mostly)
>since it is not legal under NT, 2000, XP [...]
I beg to differ. Especially because Ada is well suited for embedded
systems, where port accesses to address external devices are quite
usual.
Vinzent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-26 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-25 15:05 Omission in the Ada Standard Robert C. Leif
2003-09-25 17:12 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-09-25 19:47 ` Simon Wright
2003-09-26 1:51 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-26 2:02 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-09-26 13:05 ` Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler [this message]
2003-10-06 3:50 ` Dave Thompson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-25 18:57 Robert C. Leif
2003-09-25 19:24 Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
2003-09-26 0:30 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-09-26 16:10 ` Robert C. Leif
2003-09-26 17:38 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-28 21:43 ` Keith Thompson
2003-10-09 16:56 ` Jerry Petrey
2003-10-10 2:07 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-26 18:04 ` Jeff C,
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox