From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: who is in charge of Ada 0Y?
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:53:54 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2003-09-25T22:53:54+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bkvrm2$7vi$1@hercules.btinternet.com> (raw)
"Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:...
> "svaa" <svaa@ciberpiula.net> wrote in message
> news:87f5a614.0309251319.f66444c@posting.google.com...
> > I've seen a lot of posts and discussions about a future Ada, Ada 0Y.
> > What should be added, what should be removed, what should change. But,
> > is there any organization in charge of writing such new standard?
> >
> > As far as I've read, there is no organization planning changes for Ada
> > 0Y. In such case, Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, and so it's doomed.
> > Have I missed something? is there such organization?
>
> Yes, you have missing a _lot_, start from
here:
http://www.ada-auth.org/
and follow a couple of the links, e.g.
http://www.ada-auth.org/ais.html
http://www.ada-auth.org/arg-minutes.html
(oops, fat-finger problem)
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-25 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-25 22:53 Martin Dowie [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-25 21:19 who is in charge of Ada 0Y? svaa
2003-09-25 22:51 ` Martin Dowie
2003-09-26 0:25 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox