From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: who is in charge of Ada 0Y?
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 22:51:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2003-09-25T22:51:53+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bkvri9$18p$1@sparta.btinternet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87f5a614.0309251319.f66444c@posting.google.com
"svaa" <svaa@ciberpiula.net> wrote in message
news:87f5a614.0309251319.f66444c@posting.google.com...
> I've seen a lot of posts and discussions about a future Ada, Ada 0Y.
> What should be added, what should be removed, what should change. But,
> is there any organization in charge of writing such new standard?
>
> As far as I've read, there is no organization planning changes for Ada
> 0Y. In such case, Ada95 is as petrified as Latin, and so it's doomed.
> Have I missed something? is there such organization?
Yes, you have missing a _lot_, start from
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-25 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-25 21:19 who is in charge of Ada 0Y? svaa
2003-09-25 22:51 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
2003-09-26 0:25 ` Matthew Heaney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-25 22:53 Martin Dowie
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox