From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@saltmine.radix.net>
Subject: Re: Ada Terminal Emulator for Windows
Date: 24 Jun 2003 12:57:55 GMT
Date: 2003-06-24T12:57:55+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd9hsj$k8h$1@news1.radix.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8QNJa.7669$eE.73220@nasal.pacific.net.au
Ross Higson <rossh@zip.com.au> wrote:
> It would be great if someone could take up Larry's suggestion, and email
> me any discrepencies they find.
> I'll fix them in the next version.
> I've been using Per Lindberg and Thomas E. Dickey's "vttest" program to
> test VT compatibility, but
> there's a lot of areas that vttest doesn't test (particularly for the
> VT420) - and also a lot of areas where
> I cannot be absolutely sure my Windows version (actually a Cygwin
> version) of vttest behaves correctly.
> Vttest relies partly on functionality provided by the Unix tty device
> (e.g. it uses stty to enable/disable host
> echo, to perform inbound and outbound CR/LF translation etc).
> I've compared the terminal emulator against xterm, and (apart from a few
> cases where xterm itself
> fails the vttest) the results are identical. Does anyone know how xterm
I'm intrigued (other than the obvious - blinking characters not implemented -
are there any bugs that I may have overlooked?)
> stacks up against the official
> DEC compatibility test ?.
That would be nice to know. (I ran vttest against dxterm a few years ago,
and it mostly-agreed with vttest, though iirc, its vt300 emulation was
not complete).
> Ross.
> Larry Kilgallen wrote:
>>In article <17vJa.7569$eE.70461@nasal.pacific.net.au>, Ross Higson <rossh@zip.com.au> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>In addition to providing simple "dumb" terminal emulation, the package
>>>provides full emulation of DEC VT52/VT100/VT102 compatible terminals,
>>>including double height and double width characters, smooth scrolling,
>>>special graphics, display controls and national replacement character sets.
>>>The emulator also implements a substantial subset of VT220/VT420 and ISO
>>>6429 capabilities.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>The DEC official compatibility test is not available to the public,
I tend to disregard the term "official" in this context.
>>but I would recommend someone who has a Windows machine should test
>>this terminal emulator against a DEC Notes session, which for me has
>>been the most severe test every time I have had to use a Windows machine.
>>
>>
--
Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@radix.net> <dickey@herndon4.his.com>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-24 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-23 4:11 Ada Terminal Emulator for Windows Ross Higson
2003-06-23 11:15 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-06-24 1:28 ` Ross Higson
2003-06-24 12:57 ` Thomas Dickey [this message]
2003-06-24 23:54 ` Ross Higson
2003-06-25 11:38 ` Simon Clubley
2003-06-25 12:12 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-06-25 12:27 ` Simon Clubley
2003-06-26 0:40 ` Ross Higson
2003-06-26 23:38 ` Ross Higson
2003-06-27 3:05 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-06-28 10:18 ` Ross Higson
2003-06-28 14:29 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-06-25 12:32 ` Thomas Dickey
2003-06-26 0:10 ` Ross Higson
2003-06-26 13:57 ` Thomas Dickey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-23 4:35 Ross Higson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox