From: Thomas Bruns <newsgroup@donbruno.de>
Subject: Re: milliseconds and delay until
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:58:37 +0200
Date: 2003-06-11T20:58:37+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc7u91$t2t$00$1@news.t-online.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: MPG.195197589c4fd46e98971a@News.CIS.DFN.DE
Jano wrote:
> Thomas Bruns dice...
> Why not use better a Time type from start?
>
> Next : Time := Clock;
>
> Next := Next + 0.1;
>
> delay until Next;
mmhhhh... 0.1 is milliseconds :-) but I mean, that the time type + duration
(0.1) is not alright... I test it
Thx
Thomas
--
PS:
HW: ASUS P4PE, PIV 2.4 GHz, 768 MB RAM, Geforce 4200,
SW: Suse 8.2, Kernel 2.4.20, KDE 3.1.2, QT3.1.2, KDEVELOP 2.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-11 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-11 18:31 milliseconds and delay until Thomas Bruns
2003-06-11 18:46 ` Jano
2003-06-11 18:58 ` Thomas Bruns [this message]
2003-06-11 19:29 ` Jano
2003-06-11 19:49 ` Simon Wright
2003-06-11 20:29 ` tmoran
2003-06-12 6:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-06-11 19:59 ` Frank J. Lhota
2003-06-12 3:06 ` Steve
2003-06-12 20:26 ` Simon Wright
2003-06-12 21:41 ` Martin Dowie
2003-06-14 6:04 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox