Re: Lego Mindstoms for Ada: user group

[Matteo Bordin <matteo.bordin@gmail.com>]

On Jul 9, 1:14 am, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
> Matteo Bordin wrote on comp.lang.ada:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 8, 3:05 pm, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 8, 2:59 pm, roda...@tpg.com.au wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 8, 10:30 pm, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
> > > > > Why not use comp.lang.ada and meaningful subject lines like the one
> > > > > for this thread?  Is the traffic already too high here?
>
> > > >    Heh, the traffic on cla is *never* too high :).
>
> > > >    The worry is that the traffic on the formal lego forum may become
> > > > too high, and so obscure the purer Ada language questions on cla.
>
> > > >    At least, I can live in hope that it will be so ...
>
> > > I appreciate your forward thinking but "premature optimization is the
> > > root of all evil".  So, I think comp.lang.ada is appropriate until the
> > > Lego-related traffic becomes to high.  At that point a new forum will
> > > become necessary and justified.  Just my two cents :)
>
> > I have to say I still believe a *subgroup* of the LEGO Fan group on
> > Linkedin would be the best option. You would have the advantage of
> > having a dedicated group which is also visible to other LEGO users
> > around the globe, thus providing more visibility to the Ada language,
> > to the GNAT-on-MINDSTORMS project and to your discussions. We would
> > not have these advantages if the discussion takes place on c.l.a or
> > IRC.
>
> > I would be happy to start the discussion to create the new subgroup on
> > linkedin.
>
> The problems with LinkedIn are its proprietary and centralized nature
> and the absence of a search engine.  And it does not allow you to
> choose your client, as Usenet does.  Finally, it is a "professional"
> network, not necessarily accessible or attractive to teenagers.
>
> Making Ada more visible to the more general Lego Mindstorms is, of
> course, a worthy goal.  I therefore suggest the existing Usenet
> newsgroup alt.comp.lego-mindstorms as a better solution; in addition
> it makes cross-posting to comp.lang.ada possible and even desirable
> IMHO.
>
> --
> Ludovic Brenta.


I did not know alt.comp.lego-mindstorms: thanks Ludovic! I announced
the availability of the toolset there too.

I agree with you that this group would probably be the best option,
even if it does not seem to have a lot of traffic.

We can always signal interesting discussion on linkedin if needed.