From: raj <israelrt@optushome.com.au>
Subject: Ada better language also for programming "in the small".
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:27:54 GMT
Date: 2001-07-11T00:27:54+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba7nktcan0ojq3nvhqbic6u6ktvjm511r3@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.994717750.15420.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
On Mon, 09 Jul 2001 23:29:02 +0000, Mário Amado Alves
<maa@liacc.up.pt> wrote:
>Actually this might be a non-issue: it has been demonstrated (hopefully my talk at Ada'2001 helped ;-)
>that contrarywise to common belief Ada is a
>better language also for programming "in the small".
But this can also be said about Ocaml, Haskell, Lisp, Eiffel, Erlang,
Scheme, etc ...
And they do have the advantage of being more buzzword compliant :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-11 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-09 21:56 Death by analogy Part 1 (was RE: is Ada dead?) Michael P. Card
2001-07-09 23:29 ` Mário Amado Alves
2001-07-10 3:47 ` Michael P. Card
2001-07-11 0:27 ` raj [this message]
2001-07-11 10:06 ` Ada better language also for programming "in the small" M. A. Alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox