From: rod@praxis-cs.co.uk (Rod Chapman)
Subject: Re: Operator visibility question
Date: 4 Jun 2001 08:24:06 -0700
Date: 2001-06-04T15:24:06+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba18d5cb.0106040724.22dc5555@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccae3pfhge.fsf@world.std.com
It seems this really is a problem - several other compilers,
including trusty old DEC Ada, agree that that code fragment should
be rejected, so I'll submit it to ACT.
- Rod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-04 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-03 13:48 Operator visibility question Rod Chapman
2001-06-03 14:19 ` Jeff Creem
2001-06-03 15:47 ` Nacho Robledo
2001-06-03 20:15 ` Robert A Duff
2001-06-04 15:24 ` Rod Chapman [this message]
2001-06-04 17:55 ` Nacho Robledo
2001-06-04 21:27 ` Ted Dennison
2001-06-03 16:34 ` Florian Weimer
2001-06-04 15:52 ` Ted Dennison
2001-06-04 22:12 ` Florian Weimer
2001-06-05 12:24 ` Rod Chapman
2001-06-03 20:13 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox