From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bindings for Raptor RDF library - help wanted
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:01:11 -0600
Date: 2014-07-25T22:01:11-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bKFAv.77481$AN6.44341@fx01.iad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lqtp20$tng$1@speranza.aioe.org>
On 25-Jul-14 08:19, Victor Porton wrote:
> Probably it makes sense to backport it to Ada2005.
Hm, I dunno.. it seems like you'd be losing a lot for a relatively small
gain in compilers -- not a whole lot of compilers went to Ada 2005 as
compared to 95. So /that/ would likely be a better pack-port language...
though for full Ada-generality backporting the interface all the way to
Ada 83 (so you could feed it to DEC Ada and such).
...But this brings up an interesting point: it should be possible to
automatically generate Ada 83 specs that bind/link to the Ada 2012
compilation objects, which would give you the best result in terms of
keeping the source at the current standard and providing means for using
them in prior versions.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-26 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-25 14:19 Bindings for Raptor RDF library - help wanted Victor Porton
2014-07-26 4:01 ` Shark8 [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox