From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problem space (Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate...))
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:40:28 -0400
Date: 2003-05-12T14:40:28-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9oq3a$7i$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: u3cjk81gg.fsf@nasa.gov
"Stephen Leake" <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:u3cjk81gg.fsf@nasa.gov...
> But push it to the extreme, and people will say we should be
> programming in UML, not Ada.
But that is a foolish argument since UML is not well defined.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-12 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-12 1:31 Problem space (Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate...)) Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
2003-05-12 10:08 ` Mário Amado Alves
2003-05-13 21:04 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-12 18:27 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-12 18:40 ` Chad R. Meiners [this message]
2003-05-13 13:27 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-13 21:07 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-14 0:23 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-13 20:35 ` Problem space (Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Adamandate...)) Craig Carey
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox