From: halfmaddad@gmail.com
Subject: was Ada 83 in fact object oriented ?
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2015-09-24T15:23:57-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b975bbc7-672c-4f61-958b-04c90735560a@googlegroups.com> (raw)
Hi Everyone
Not a really important post here, I was just wondering what opinions people might have about something.
OO is a huge topic but I am wondering what are the basic requirements for a language to be said to support object orientation.
Ada 83 had packages and one package could be instantiated more then one time.
Is it fair to say that basic class and methods were therefore supported?
Do you have any examples of a language that just meets the threshold of being OO ?
Thanks for reading-Patrick
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-24 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-24 22:23 halfmaddad [this message]
2015-09-24 23:47 ` was Ada 83 in fact object oriented ? Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-09-25 2:30 ` halfmaddad
2015-09-25 8:11 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 8:30 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-09-25 8:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 8:03 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 8:14 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-09-25 8:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 11:04 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-09-25 12:17 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 12:44 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-09-25 15:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-09-25 12:44 ` halfmaddad
2015-09-25 16:24 ` Pascal Obry
2015-09-25 20:32 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-10-05 12:27 ` vincent.diemunsch
2015-10-01 13:46 ` Paul Colin de Gloucester
2015-10-05 12:12 ` Vincent
2015-10-05 18:28 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox