From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Generic formal access types
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:42:50 -0400
Date: 2003-04-30T17:42:50-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8pgat$1al4$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3eb01630@epflnews.epfl.ch
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 311 bytes --]
How about
generic
type Access_Type is private;
Null_Value : Access_Type;
-CRM
"Rodrigo Garc�a" <rodrigo.garcia.ARROBA.epfl.ch> wrote in message
news:3eb01630@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> Does anybody know why Ada does not have something like:
>
> generic
> type Access_Type is access (<>); -- ?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-30 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-30 18:30 Generic formal access types
2003-04-30 19:27 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-01 8:58 `
2003-04-30 21:42 ` Chad R. Meiners [this message]
2003-05-01 9:06 `
2003-05-01 9:58 ` Martin Krischik
2003-05-01 13:00 `
2003-05-02 9:14 ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-05-02 10:43 `
2003-05-02 10:50 `
2003-05-01 10:09 `
2003-05-02 1:14 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 9:52 `
2003-05-02 16:18 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 16:57 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-02 19:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-05-05 8:14 `
2003-05-05 16:40 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-05-05 17:34 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox