From: sbelmont700@gmail.com
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2013 bug?
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 03:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-08-09T03:38:21-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b89f7b9a-1437-4e46-ace1-1355cc2a16c5@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19fr4wmxmen$.gjbias2fj461$.dlg@40tude.net>
Aren't dispatching access parameters inherently always 'not null' anyway, and the explicit qualifier just an optional readability thing?
-sb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-09 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-09 9:47 GNAT GPL 2013 bug? Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-08-09 10:38 ` sbelmont700 [this message]
2013-08-09 11:01 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-08-09 11:06 ` sbelmont700
2013-08-09 11:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-08-09 15:48 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-08-09 16:11 ` Simon Wright
2013-08-09 16:52 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-08-09 18:25 ` Simon Wright
2013-08-09 18:39 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-08-09 19:28 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-08-09 20:05 ` Robert A Duff
2013-08-09 20:30 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-08-09 21:35 ` Simon Wright
2013-08-10 15:10 ` Shark8
2013-08-09 16:03 ` Simon Wright
2013-08-09 18:55 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-08-09 19:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-08-09 20:04 ` Robert A Duff
2013-08-10 6:51 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-08-12 16:52 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-08-12 17:03 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-08-12 17:20 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-08-12 18:34 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-08-12 20:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-08-13 6:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox