From: "kat-Zygfryd" <6667@wp.pl>
Subject: Re: virtual destructors
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:45:26 +0200
Date: 2003-04-22T15:45:33+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b83o2t$gd8$1@news.onet.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b83l69$7bk$1@news.onet.pl
Never mind, I didn;t thinf of directly declaring
procedure Free is new Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation(Base'Class,CBase);
procedure Free is new Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation(Derived'Class,CDerived);
Another question: are there any advantages in using
Ada.Finalization for objects that will always be dynamically
allocated/deallocated over simply declaring a Dispose procedure,
with frees object's components before freeing itself?
Zygfryd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-22 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-22 14:18 virtual destructors kat-Zygfryd
2003-04-22 14:27 ` Stephen Leake
2003-04-22 14:56 ` kat-Zygfryd
2003-04-22 15:45 ` kat-Zygfryd [this message]
2003-04-22 16:34 ` tmoran
2003-04-22 21:32 ` Robert A Duff
2003-04-22 17:18 ` Stephen Leake
2003-04-22 16:34 ` Simon Wright
2003-04-22 19:57 ` Stephen Leake
2003-04-22 20:19 ` Simon Wright
2003-04-22 21:23 ` Robert A Duff
2003-04-23 15:16 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-04-22 17:31 ` virtual destructors - doesn't seem to work kat-Zygfryd
2003-04-22 17:32 ` Simon Wright
2003-04-22 17:33 ` virtual destructors Matthew Heaney
2003-04-22 17:28 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-04-22 17:40 ` kat-Zygfryd
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox